|Listed in category:
Have one to sell?

Reading the Constitution : Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism by Stephen...

US $19.95
ApproximatelyRM 84.29
Condition:
Brand New
Hurry before it's gone. 1 person is watching this item.
Breathe easy. Returns accepted.
Shipping:
US $4.15 (approx RM 17.53) USPS Media MailTM.
Located in: Denver, Colorado, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Sat, 6 Sep and Fri, 12 Sep to 94104
Delivery time is estimated using our proprietary method which is based on the buyer's proximity to the item location, the shipping service selected, the seller's shipping history, and other factors. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.
Returns:
30 days return. Buyer pays for return shipping. If you use an eBay shipping label, it will be deducted from your refund amount.
Coverage:
Read item description or contact seller for details. See all detailsSee all details on coverage
(Not eligible for eBay purchase protection programmes)
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:405935078312

Item specifics

Condition
Brand New: A new, unread, unused book in perfect condition with no missing or damaged pages. See all condition definitionsopens in a new window or tab
ISBN
9781668021545

About this product

Product Identifiers

Publisher
Simon & Schuster
ISBN-10
1668021544
ISBN-13
9781668021545
eBay Product ID (ePID)
23072095053

Product Key Features

Book Title
Reading the Constitution : Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
Number of Pages
368 Pages
Language
English
Publication Year
2025
Topic
American Government / Judicial Branch, Constitutional, Constitutions, United States / 21st Century
Genre
Law, Political Science, History
Author
Stephen Breyer
Format
Trade Paperback

Dimensions

Item Height
1 in
Item Weight
10.1 Oz
Item Length
8.4 in
Item Width
5.5 in

Additional Product Features

Intended Audience
Trade
Reviews
A rocket from a Supreme Court justice who served 28 years on the Court. Justice Breyer shows how the current Supreme Court's alleged textualism and originalism are unsound. His book is a judicial arms-control agreement advocating moderation and a path to what he calls 'workable democracy.' You will not read a more important legal work this election year.
Dewey Edition
23
Dewey Decimal
342.7302
Synopsis
New York Times Bestseller In a provocative and brilliant analysis, retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer deconstructs the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court's supermajority and makes the case for a more pragmatic approach of the Constitution. "You will not read a more important legal work this election year." --Bob Woodward, Washington Post reporter and author of fifteen #1 New York Times bestselling books "A dissent for the ages." -- The Washington Post "Breyer's candor about the state of the court is refreshing and much needed." -- The Boston Globe The relatively new judicial philosophy of textualism dominates the Supreme Court. Textualists claim that the right way to interpret the Constitution and statutes is to read the text carefully and examine the language as it was understood at the time the documents were written. This, however, is not Justice Breyer's philosophy nor has it been the traditional way to interpret the Constitution since the time of Chief Justice John Marshall. Justice Breyer recalls Marshall's exhortation that the Constitution must be a workable set of principles to be interpreted by subsequent generations. Most important in interpreting law, says Breyer, is to understand the statutes as well as the consequences of deciding a case one way or another. He illustrates these principles by examining some of the most important cases in the nation's history, among them the Dobbs and Bruen decisions from 2022 that he argues were wrongly decided and have led to harmful results., Textualist justices claim that the right way to interpret the Constitution and statutes is to read the text carefully and examine the language as it was understood at the time the documents were written. This, however, is not Justice Breyer's philosophy, nor has it been the traditional way to interpret the Constitution since the time of Chief Justice John Marshall. Justice Breyer reminds us of Marshall's exhortation that the Constitution must be a workable set of principles to be interpreted by subsequent generations. Reading the Constitution is a powerful argument for judicial pragmatism from one of our nation's most distinguished jurists.

Item description from the seller

About this seller

spicagift

100% positive feedback81 items sold

Joined Feb 2025
Usually responds within 24 hours
Welcome to Spicagift, your ultimate destination for unique finds and cherished treasures! Dive into our captivating collectibles section, where every item tells a story and sparks nostalgia. For ...
See more

Detailed Seller Ratings

Average for the last 12 months
Accurate description
--
Reasonable shipping cost
--
Shipping speed
5.0
Communication
5.0

Seller feedback (30)

All ratings
Positive
Neutral
Negative