Picture 1 of 3



Gallery
Picture 1 of 3



Have one to sell?
The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power (Writing Science) (P…
US $19.90
ApproximatelyRM 83.71
Condition:
“Some underlining and notes.”
Good
A book that has been read but is in good condition. Very minimal damage to the cover including scuff marks, but no holes or tears. The dust jacket for hard covers may not be included. Binding has minimal wear. The majority of pages are undamaged with minimal creasing or tearing, minimal pencil underlining of text, no highlighting of text, no writing in margins. No missing pages.
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
Shipping:
Free USPS Media MailTM.
Located in: Seattle, Washington, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Tue, 7 Oct and Fri, 10 Oct to 94104
Returns:
30 days return. Buyer pays for return shipping. If you use an eBay shipping label, it will be deducted from your refund amount.
Coverage:
Read item description or contact seller for details. See all detailsSee all details on coverage
(Not eligible for eBay purchase protection programmes)
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:333792129501
Item specifics
- Condition
- Good
- Seller Notes
- “Some underlining and notes.”
- Topic
- Writing
- Country
- USA
- ISBN
- 9780804725620
About this product
Product Identifiers
Publisher
Stanford University Press
ISBN-10
0804725624
ISBN-13
9780804725620
eBay Product ID (ePID)
687551
Product Key Features
Number of Pages
584 Pages
Publication Name
Disunity of Science : Boundaries, Contexts, and Power
Language
English
Publication Year
1996
Subject
Philosophy & Social Aspects
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Science
Series
Writing Science Ser.
Format
Trade Paperback
Dimensions
Item Height
1.2 in
Item Weight
28.8 Oz
Item Length
9 in
Item Width
6 in
Additional Product Features
Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
LCCN
95-009064
Reviews
"This is a very important work, with contributions by many of the most prominent scholars in science studies....It actually delivers on its promise to renew discussion and develop fresh ideas about the allegation that the sciences are no longer (or never were) unified by a single theoretical view of nature or a methodological foundation." --Michael Lynch, Brunel University, "This is a very important work, with contributions by many of the most prominent scholars in science studies....It actually delivers on its promise to renew discussion and develop fresh ideas about the allegation that the sciences are no longer (or never were) unified by a single theoretical view of nature or a methodological foundation." -Michael Lynch, Brunel University, This is a very important work, with contributions by many of the most prominent scholars in science studies....It actually delivers on its promise to renew discussion and develop fresh ideas about the allegation that the sciences are no longer (or never were) unified by a single theoretical view of nature or a methodological foundation." —Michael Lynch, Brunel University
TitleLeading
The
Dewey Edition
20
Illustrated
Yes
Dewey Decimal
501
Synopsis
Is science unified or disunified? Over the last century, the question has raised the interest (and hackles) of scientists, philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, for at stake is how science and society fit together. Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity, ranging from the please of condensed matter physicists for disciplinary autonomy all the way to discussions in the humanities and social sciences that involve local history, feminism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, scientific relativism and realism, and social constructivism. Many of these varied aspects of the debate over the disunity of science are reflected in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studying science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science. How does the context of discover shape knowledge? What are the philosophical consequences of a disunified science? Does, for example, an antirealism, a realism, or an arealism become defensible within a picture of local scientific knowledge? What politics lies behind and follows from a picture of the world of science more like a quilt than a pyramid? Who gains and loses if representation of science has standards that vary from place to place, field to field, and practitioner to practitioner.
LC Classification Number
Q175
Item description from the seller
Popular categories from this store
Seller feedback (1,132)
- k***p (917)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseExcellent condition
- Évaluations automatiques eBay- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthCommande terminée - avec suivi et dans les délais
- 4***2 (15)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseItem arrived quickly and as described. Thanks!
More to explore :
- Science Popular Science Magazines,
- Science Magazines,
- Science Fiction Popular Science Magazines,
- Science Popular Science Magazines in English,
- Illustrated Science Popular Science Magazines,
- Science Fiction Magazines,
- Science Audiobook Audiobooks,
- Computer Science Textbooks,
- Science Fiction Fiction Fiction & Books,
- Science Fiction Audiobooks