Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of...

US $24.00
ApproximatelyRM 100.55
or Best Offer
Condition:
Good
Tabbed and yellow highlights
Hurry before it's gone. 1 person is watching this item.
Breathe easy. Returns accepted.
Pickup:
Free local pickup from Maumee, Ohio, United States.
Shipping:
US $5.22 (approx RM 21.87) USPS Media MailTM.
Located in: Maumee, Ohio, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Thu, 6 Nov and Mon, 10 Nov to 94104
Delivery time is estimated using our proprietary method which is based on the buyer's proximity to the item location, the shipping service selected, the seller's shipping history, and other factors. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.
Returns:
30 days return. Buyer pays for return shipping. If you use an eBay shipping label, it will be deducted from your refund amount.
Coverage:
Read item description or contact seller for details. See all detailsSee all details on coverage
(Not eligible for eBay purchase protection programmes)
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:236423985093

Item specifics

Condition
Good
A book that has been read but is in good condition. Very minimal damage to the cover including scuff marks, but no holes or tears. The dust jacket for hard covers may not be included. Binding has minimal wear. The majority of pages are undamaged with minimal creasing or tearing, minimal pencil underlining of text, no highlighting of text, no writing in margins. No missing pages. See all condition definitionsopens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes
“Tabbed and yellow highlights”
Release Year
1992
Book Title
Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietna...
ISBN
9780691025353
Category

About this product

Product Identifiers

Publisher
Princeton University Press
ISBN-10
0691025355
ISBN-13
9780691025353
eBay Product ID (ePID)
244281

Product Key Features

Number of Pages
304 Pages
Publication Name
Analogies at War : Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965
Language
English
Publication Year
1992
Subject
Military / General, Military / Vietnam War, International Relations / General
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Political Science, History
Author
Yuen Foong Khong
Format
Trade Paperback

Dimensions

Item Height
0.9 in
Item Weight
16 Oz
Item Length
9.2 in
Item Width
6.1 in

Additional Product Features

Intended Audience
College Audience
Reviews
Khong's interviews and newly declassified documents make a compelling case the American decision-makers in 1965 used historical analogies not only to justify decisions but to make them, most notably in the process of rejecting options., "Khong's interviews and newly declassified documents make a compelling case the American decision-makers in 1965 used historical analogies not only to justify decisions but to make them, most notably in the process of rejecting options." -- Foreign Affairs, Khong's interviews and newly declassified documents make a compelling case the American decision-makers in 1965 used historical analogies not only to justify decisions but to make them, most notably in the process of rejecting options. -- Foreign Affairs, "Khong's interviews and newly declassified documents make a compelling case the American decision-makers in 1965 used historical analogies not only to justify decisions but to make them, most notably in the process of rejecting options."-- Foreign Affairs
Illustrated
Yes
Table Of Content
List of Figures and Tables Acknowledgments Abbreviations Pt. I The Argument Ch. 1 Analogical Reasoning in Foreign Affairs: Two Views 3 Ch. 2 The AE Framework 19 Ch. 3 America's Vietnam Options 47 Pt. II The Cases Ch. 4 Containment, Analogies, and the Pre-1965 Vietnam Decisions 71 Ch. 5 Korea 97 Ch. 6 Dien Bien Phu 148 Ch. 7 Munich and the 1930s 174 Pt. III The Implications Ch. 8 The Psychology of Analogical Reasoning 209 Ch. 9 Conclusion 251 Bibliography 265 Index 279
Synopsis
From WWI to Operation Desert Storm, American policymakers have repeatedly invoked the 'lessons of history' as they contemplated taking their nation to war. This work argues that leaders use analogies not merely to justify policies but also to perform specific cognitive and information-processing tasks essential to political decision-making., From World War I to Operation Desert Storm, American policymakers have repeatedly invoked the "lessons of history" as they contemplated taking their nation to war. Do these historical analogies actually shape policy, or are they primarily tools of political justification? Yuen Foong Khong argues that leaders use analogies not merely to justify policies but also to perform specific cognitive and information-processing tasks essential to political decision-making. Khong identifies what these tasks are and shows how they can be used to explain the U.S. decision to intervene in Vietnam. Relying on interviews with senior officials and on recently declassified documents, the author demonstrates with a precision not attained by previous studies that the three most important analogies of the Vietnam era--Korea, Munich, and Dien Bien Phu--can account for America's Vietnam choices. A special contribution is the author's use of cognitive social psychology to support his argument about how humans analogize and to explain why policymakers often use analogies poorly., From World War 1 to Operation Desert Storm, American policymakers have repeatedly invoked the "lessons of history" as they contemplated taking their nation to war. Do these historical analogies actually shape policy, or are they primarily tools of political justification? Yuen Foong Khong argues that leaders use analogies not merely to justify policies but also to perform specific cognitive and information-processing tasks essential to political decision-making. Khong identifies what these tasks are and shows how they can be used to explain the U.S. decision to intervene in Vietnam. Relying on interviews with senior officials and on recently declassified documents, the author demonstrates with a precision not attained by previous studies that the three most important analogies of the Vietnam era - Korea, Munich and Dien Bien Phu - can account for America's Vietnam choices. A special contribution is the author's use of cognitive social psychology to support his argument about how humans analogize and to explain why policymakers often use analogies poorly.
LC Classification Number
DS558.K55

Item description from the seller

About this seller

HipCheetah

99.4% positive feedback1.1K items sold

Joined Jun 2021
I sell items from my private collection as well as items bought for resale from auctions and estate sales.

Detailed Seller Ratings

Average for the last 12 months
Accurate description
4.9
Reasonable shipping cost
4.6
Shipping speed
5.0
Communication
5.0

Seller feedback (405)

All ratingsselected
Positive
Neutral
Negative
  • 3***4 (339)- Feedback left by buyer.
    Past 6 months
    Verified purchase
    Great price and fast delivery. Well packaged and works well. Like new condition as advertised. Very happy with the purchase. A+ for the seller. 5 stars all day.
  • e***o (20)- Feedback left by buyer.
    Past month
    Verified purchase
    Book arrived quickly and packaged to safeguard the contents. Used book, as described. A++ seller, easy transaction!
  • b***n (562)- Feedback left by buyer.
    Past 6 months
    Verified purchase
    REASONABLE SHIPPING, GOOD PACKAGING, PRODUCT IN GOOD CONDITION. GOOD SELLER. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED , AAAAAAAAAAA. ++++++++++++++++++ GOOD VALUE OF MONEY AS DESCRIBE.