Is Administrative Law Unlawful? - Paperback Book By Hamburger, Philip - GOOD

US $29.98
ApproximatelyRM 123.88
or Best Offer
Condition:
Good
Breathe easy. Free shipping and returns.
Shipping:
Free USPS Media MailTM.
Located in: Bakersfield, California, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Mon, 1 Dec and Fri, 5 Dec to 94104
Delivery time is estimated using our proprietary method which is based on the buyer's proximity to the item location, the shipping service selected, the seller's shipping history, and other factors. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.
Returns:
30 days return. Seller pays for return shipping.
Coverage:
Read item description or contact seller for details. See all detailsSee all details on coverage
(Not eligible for eBay purchase protection programmes)
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:235999142169

Item specifics

Condition
Good: A book that has been read but is in good condition. Very minimal damage to the cover including ...
Brand
Unbranded
Book Title
Is Administrative Law Unlawful?
MPN
Does not apply
ISBN
9780226324630
Category

About this product

Product Identifiers

Publisher
University of Chicago Press
ISBN-10
022632463X
ISBN-13
9780226324630
eBay Product ID (ePID)
24038261339

Product Key Features

Number of Pages
648 Pages
Language
English
Publication Name
Is Administrative Law Unlawful?
Subject
Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice, History & Theory, General
Publication Year
2015
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Law, Political Science
Author
Philip Hamburger
Format
Trade Paperback

Dimensions

Item Height
0.1 in
Item Weight
38 Oz
Item Length
0.9 in
Item Width
0.6 in

Additional Product Features

Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
Dewey Edition
23
Reviews
[ Is Administrative Law Unlawful? ] is the author's most ambitious, even daring, work, for not only does it question important features of administrative law; it challenges (as the title suggests) their very legality. . . . Deeply researched and well written, the book is a veritable cornucopia of fresh and significant insights that will greatly enrich the existing literature. It is a work of encyclopedic breadth and erudition, confirming that its author is equally comfortable with grand themes and matters of granular detail., Philip Hamburger's Is Administrative Law Unlawful? is a powerful legal broadside against the American administrative state., With characteristic erudition, Philip Hamburger shows how virtually every aspect of the modern administrative state undermines the Anglo-American legal tradition-or at least that part of the tradition that most informed the American founding. It is a provocative thesis, but one that is amply supported by extensive scholarly argument and fascinating historical study. Hamburger makes an impressive case that modern administrative law owes its lineage to claims of monarchical prerogative and civil law absolutism that were precisely the ideas that the American revolution was trying to reject. This is a tremendously important book., A masterful look at the origins and legitimacy of American administrative law. . . . Anyone interested in the rise of the American administrative state will benefit from this original, erudite, and thought-provoking book., An interesting new work by Philip Hamburger dispenses with the tiresome back and forth between Republicans and Democrats. Instead, it focuses on Washington's permanent administration--the ever-expanding federal bureaucracies that have come to play a central role in health care, finance, housing and work, and large roles in education, energy and whatever else constitutes the American system. . . . Hamburger's book is filled with details of how the centralisation of power divorced from a popular or court mandate leads to insularity and even insurrection as hopes of efficiency and expertise give way to bureaucratic inertia., A serious work of legal scholarship. . . . This is a book that rewards the reader with a deepened understanding of the Constitution and the challenges that confront us in the task of restoration. . . . The news of the day repeatedly buttresses the powerful case Hamburger makes against the legitimacy of the vast administrative apparatus that does so much to dictate the way we live now. It is a book not only of this season but of many seasons to come., Hamburger argues persuasively that America has overlaid its constitutional system with a form of governance that is both alien and dangerous. . . . Some readers undoubtedly will find daunting this book's length. . . . But it is lucidly written and carefully organized, and certainly it is no small task to analyze just how deeply the administrative state threatens liberty and constitutionalism. Scholars will return to Hamburger's exhaustive explication of these issues for a long time to come., An interesting new work by Philip Hamburger dispenses with the tiresome back and forth between Republicans and Democrats. Instead, it focuses on Washington's permanent administration-the ever-expanding federal bureaucracies that have come to play a central role in health care, finance, housing and work, and large roles in education, energy and whatever else constitutes the American system. . . . Hamburger's book is filled with details of how the centralisation of power divorced from a popular or court mandate leads to insularity and even insurrection as hopes of efficiency and expertise give way to bureaucratic inertia., Is Administrative Law Unlawful? is a work of the very highest quality, a learned scholarly exegesis setting out the intellectual foundations--in medieval and early modern English constitutional thought--for the proposition that the contemporary American administrative state is profoundly unconstitutional and unlawful. Philip Hamburger's argument is intricately wrought and forcefully expressed. Its indictment of modern administration in America doubles as a major statement on the virtues of a genuinely constitutional government., With characteristic erudition, Philip Hamburger shows how virtually every aspect of the modern administrative state undermines the Anglo-American legal tradition--or at least that part of the tradition that most informed the American founding. It is a provocative thesis, but one that is amply supported by extensive scholarly argument and fascinating historical study. Hamburger makes an impressive case that modern administrative law owes its lineage to claims of monarchical prerogative and civil law absolutism that were precisely the ideas that the American revolution was trying to reject. This is a tremendously important book., Immensely important. . . . Hamburger indicts the entire structure of executive-agency rulemaking as illegitimate. . . . An argument of deep passion, learning, intelligence, and consequence that deserves to reach the widest possible audience., The administrative state is a modern invention. It was, and remains, a necessity in our complex modern age. Or so goes the argument. . . . Hamburger meticulously (and sometimes laboriously) demonstrates how the modern administrative state revives all the attributes of the royal prerogative and absolute power.
Dewey Decimal
342.06
Table Of Content
INTRODUCTION 1. The Debate 2. Conceptual Framework I . EXTRALEGAL LEGISLATION 3. Proclamations 4. Interpretation, Regulation, and Taxation 5. Suspending and Dispensing Powers 6. Lawful Executive Acts Adjacent to Legislation 7. Return to Extralegal Legislation I I . EXTRALEGAL ADJUDICATION 8. Prerogative Courts 9. Without Judges and Juries 10. Inquisitorial Process 11. Prerogative Orders and Warrants 12. Lawful Executive Acts Adjacent to Adjudication 13. Return to Extralegal Adjudication 14. Rule through the Law and the Courts of Law I I I . SUPRALEGAL POWER AND JUDICIAL DEFERENCE 15. Deference 16. Return to Deference IV. CONSOLIDATED POWER 17. Unspecialized 18. Undivided 19. Unrepresentative 20. Subdelegated 21. Unfederal V. ABSOLUTE POWER 22. Absolutism 23. Necessity 24. The German Connection 25. Obstacles CONCLUSION Notes Index of Cases General Index
Synopsis
Is administrative law unlawful? This provocative question has become all the more significant with the expansion of the modern administrative state. While the federal government traditionally could constrain liberty only through acts of Congress and the courts, the executive branch has increasingly come to control Americans through its own administrative rules and adjudication, thus raising disturbing questions about the effect of this sort of state power on American government and society. With Is Administrative Law Unlawful?, Philip Hamburger answers this question in the affirmative, offering a revisionist account of administrative law. Rather than accepting it as a novel power necessitated by modern society, he locates its origins in the medieval and early modern English tradition of royal prerogative. Then he traces resistance to administrative law from the Middle Ages to the present. Medieval parliaments periodically tried to confine the Crown to governing through regular law, but the most effective response was the seventeenth-century development of English constitutional law, which concluded that the government could rule only through the law of the land and the courts, not through administrative edicts. Although the US Constitution pursued this conclusion even more vigorously, administrative power reemerged in the Progressive and New Deal Eras. Since then, Hamburger argues, administrative law has returned American government and society to precisely the sort of consolidated or absolute power that the US Constitution--and constitutions in general--were designed to prevent. With a clear yet many-layered argument that draws on history, law, and legal thought, Is Administrative Law Unlawful? reveals administrative law to be not a benign, natural outgrowth of contemporary government but a pernicious--and profoundly unlawful--return to dangerous pre-constitutional absolutism., Today, administrative law is the usual means used by the federal government to create regulations. Most commentators usually trace the origins of administrative law to the 1930s, seeing it as a response to modern circumstances which could not have been anticipated by the Constitution. Philip Hamburger's provocative book offers a revisionist account that shows administrative law to be, instead, more closely related to the much older tradition of royal prerogative. Rather than a novel power necessitated by modernized society, he shows administrative law to have its roots in an ancient and persistent sort of power, one which enabled rulers to exert their will through a mechanism other than the law. His massive historical account of absolute power, and the responses to it, spans the Middle Ages to the present. Medieval parliaments sporadically attempted to confine the Crown to governing through the law, but the most effective response was the development of constitutional law in the seventeenth century. Englishmen then put an end to binding prerogative powers by concluding that their constitution required their government to rule only through the law and the courts. Hamburger argues that the U.S. Constitution imposed such requirements even more vigorously, but that the prerogative power re-emerged here as the modern administrative state under FDR began to take shape. Since then, administrative law has transformed American government and society. For Hamburger, administrative law represents a kind of absolute power that our Constitution--and constitutions in general--were designed to prevent., Is administrative law unlawful? This provocative question has become all the more significant with the expansion of the modern administrative state. While the federal government traditionally could constrain liberty only through acts of Congress and the courts, the executive branch has increasingly come to control Americans through its own administrative rules and adjudication, thus raising disturbing questions about the effect of this sort of state power on American government and society. With Is Administrative Law Unlawful?, Philip Hamburger answers this question in the affirmative, offering a revisionist account of administrative law. Rather than accepting it as a novel power necessitated by modern society, he locates its origins in the medieval and early modern English tradition of royal prerogative. Then he traces resistance to administrative law from the Middle Ages to the present. Medieval parliaments periodically tried to confine the Crown to governing through regular law, but the most effective response was the seventeenth-century development of English constitutional law, which concluded that the government could rule only through the law of the land and the courts, not through administrative edicts. Although the US Constitution pursued this conclusion even more vigorously, administrative power reemerged in the Progressive and New Deal Eras. Since then, Hamburger argues, administrative law has returned American government and society to precisely the sort of consolidated or absolute power that the US Constitution-and constitutions in general-were designed to prevent. With a clear yet many-layered argument that draws on history, law, and legal thought, Is Administrative Law Unlawful? reveals administrative law to be not a benign, natural outgrowth of contemporary government but a pernicious-and profoundly unlawful-return to dangerous pre-constitutional absolutism.
LC Classification Number
K3400.H253 2015

Item description from the seller

About this seller

neverwhere

100% positive feedback535 items sold

Joined Nov 2017
Usually responds within 24 hours

Detailed Seller Ratings

Average for the last 12 months
Accurate description
4.9
Reasonable shipping cost
5.0
Shipping speed
5.0
Communication
5.0

Seller feedback (197)

All ratingsselected
Positive
Neutral
Negative