|Listed in category:
This listing was ended by the seller on Mon, 4 Mar at 6:26 AM because the item is no longer available.
Have one to sell?

Vintage Ants in the Pants Game Schaper 1969 with BOX

Condition:
Used
Ended: Mar 05, 2024 06:26:46 MYT
Price:
US $15.29
ApproximatelyRM 71.60
Was US $17.99 What does this price mean?
Recent sales price provided by the seller
Save US $2.70 (15% off)
Postage:
US $12.99 (approx RM 60.83) Expedited Postage. See detailsfor shipping
Located in: Bartlesville, Oklahoma, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Tue, 21 May and Sat, 25 May to 43230
Delivery time is estimated using our proprietary method which is based on the buyer's proximity to the item location, the postage service selected, the seller's postage history, and other factors. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.
Coverage:
Read item description or contact seller for details. See all detailsSee all details on coverage
(Not eligible for eBay purchase protection programmes)

Seller information

Registered as a Business Seller
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:225878714804

Item specifics

Condition
Used: An item that has been used previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ...
Game Title
Ants in the Pants
Custom Bundle
No
MPN
404
Age Level
4-7, 8-11 Years, 12-16 Years
Gender
Boys & Girls
Modified Item
No
Brand
Schaper
Game Type
Children's Game
Min. Number of Players
2 players
Year
1969
Award
Games 100
Theme
Strategy
Recommended Age Range
Adult Collector
Country/Region of Manufacture
United States
UPC
Does not apply

Item description from the seller

MulberryFind

MulberryFind

100% positive feedback
672 items sold
Usually responds within 24 hours

Detailed Seller Ratings

Average for the last 12 months

Accurate description
5.0
Reasonable shipping cost
4.8
Shipping speed
5.0
Communication
5.0

Seller feedback (242)

m***l (925)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past 6 months
Verified purchase
Great condition. Always appreciate a good seller. This was as pictured. Thanks.
See all feedback